<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading the New York Times Poll on Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:38:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT Hits Deficit Panic Button (Again)</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-102115</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT Hits Deficit Panic Button (Again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 20:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13038#comment-102115</guid>
		<description>[...] to the story by Jackie Calmes and Dalia Sussman (headlined &quot;Poll Finds Willingness to Cut Spending, Just Not Medicare or Social Security&quot;), the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the story by Jackie Calmes and Dalia Sussman (headlined &quot;Poll Finds Willingness to Cut Spending, Just Not Medicare or Social Security&quot;), the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: September 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-39474</link>
		<dc:creator>September 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13038#comment-39474</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/ 9/24 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/</a> 9/24 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankinbun</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-9485</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankinbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13038#comment-9485</guid>
		<description>I got a phone call from a polling agency yesterday, can&#039;t remember which one, and on the second question I answered &quot;no&quot;. The next question was whether I was a republican. When I answered &quot;no&quot; to that question they thanked me and hung up. Selective polling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a phone call from a polling agency yesterday, can&#039;t remember which one, and on the second question I answered &#034;no&#034;. The next question was whether I was a republican. When I answered &#034;no&#034; to that question they thanked me and hung up. Selective polling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Roache</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/25/reading-the-new-york-times-poll-on-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-9448</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Roache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13038#comment-9448</guid>
		<description>I believe that Justin is mistaken about the media polls.  They do not poll only there own readers (it&#039;s Fox Noise that does that).  They contract with professional polling organizations that follows the procedures outlined by Justin.

In the case of Rasmussen, I have read that they count only those &quot;strongly&quot; in favor, believing that intensity is more important than numbers.  Given the effectiveness of the right wing noise machine, it is no surprise that opponents would register more &quot;strongly&quot; than the average respondent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Justin is mistaken about the media polls.  They do not poll only there own readers (it&#039;s Fox Noise that does that).  They contract with professional polling organizations that follows the procedures outlined by Justin.</p>
<p>In the case of Rasmussen, I have read that they count only those &#034;strongly&#034; in favor, believing that intensity is more important than numbers.  Given the effectiveness of the right wing noise machine, it is no surprise that opponents would register more &#034;strongly&#034; than the average respondent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

