<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USA Today&#039;s Afghanistan Non-Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:38:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fox News Commentators Find &#8216;Common Ground&#8217; in Praising Fox News - Fox News Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-14946</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox News Commentators Find &#8216;Common Ground&#8217; in Praising Fox News - Fox News Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12945#comment-14946</guid>
		<description>[...] brand of &#8220;criticism&#8221; is hardly likely to earn him a reprimand from Fox&#8211;in fact, it&#8217;s exactly what gets you a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brand of &#034;criticism&#034; is hardly likely to earn him a reprimand from Fox&#8211;in fact, it&#039;s exactly what gets you a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Meet the Press Continues the Non-Debate on Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-9942</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Meet the Press Continues the Non-Debate on Afghanistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12945#comment-9942</guid>
		<description>[...] see recent FAIR Blog posts on fake Afghanistan debates in Time magazine (10/2/09), USA Today (9/17/09) and the Washington Post (9/01/09, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see recent FAIR Blog posts on fake Afghanistan debates in Time magazine (10/2/09), USA Today (9/17/09) and the Washington Post (9/01/09, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightgaunt</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-9436</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightgaunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12945#comment-9436</guid>
		<description>Instead of the Taliban they have the Northern Alliance (the other Taliban) instead. Karzai, a stooge and corrupt president of six blocks of Kabul, in the fiefdoms of Afghanistan. Our man. The Taliban made the mistake of moving fast enough to take on al-Quaida for the USA who mixed them together ever since. The Taliban, created by the ISI of Pakistan to administer Afghanistan and keep it quite puts us into a quandry doesn&#039;t it? Or does it?

Afghanistan is our base to watch and attack Pakistan as they need to because of the nuclear arsenal there. We shouldn&#039;t be there and it just does worse things to people the longer we are there for imperial reasons. Afghanistan isn&#039;t really a country. Just a crazy quilt of fiefdoms under one flag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of the Taliban they have the Northern Alliance (the other Taliban) instead. Karzai, a stooge and corrupt president of six blocks of Kabul, in the fiefdoms of Afghanistan. Our man. The Taliban made the mistake of moving fast enough to take on al-Quaida for the USA who mixed them together ever since. The Taliban, created by the ISI of Pakistan to administer Afghanistan and keep it quite puts us into a quandry doesn&#039;t it? Or does it?</p>
<p>Afghanistan is our base to watch and attack Pakistan as they need to because of the nuclear arsenal there. We shouldn&#039;t be there and it just does worse things to people the longer we are there for imperial reasons. Afghanistan isn&#039;t really a country. Just a crazy quilt of fiefdoms under one flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard sosbee</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-9430</link>
		<dc:creator>howard sosbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12945#comment-9430</guid>
		<description>Bill Smale just offered the most enlightened and valid summation of the Afghan situation anyone has put forth to date. I can only hope Obama is thinking this realistically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Smale just offered the most enlightened and valid summation of the Afghan situation anyone has put forth to date. I can only hope Obama is thinking this realistically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

