<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#039;Center&#039; of the Health Reform Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: August 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-39532</link>
		<dc:creator>August 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11794#comment-39532</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; At WaPo, &#39;Others Tell Readers What &#34;Populists&#34; Think&#39;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-8577</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; At WaPo, &#39;Others Tell Readers What &#34;Populists&#34; Think&#39;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11794#comment-8577</guid>
		<description>[...] (Beat the Press, 8/9/09) sees the Washington Post as simply &quot;keeping with its strict editorial policy of only letting others tell readers what &#039;populists&#039; think,&quot; when publishing its August 9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Beat the Press, 8/9/09) sees the Washington Post as simply &quot;keeping with its strict editorial policy of only letting others tell readers what &#39;populists&#39; think,&quot; when publishing its August 9 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-8556</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 08:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11794#comment-8556</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Doug.  The Senate Finance Committee might ditch the joke &quot;public option&quot; for the wrong reasons, but it does need to ditched.  FAIR did a great expose on the media blackout of single-payer.  People who want the &quot;public option&quot; still probably think that this means a Medicare option, since the corporate media hasn&#039;t publicized the fact that now, it isn&#039;t.  Single=payer is still what people want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m with Doug.  The Senate Finance Committee might ditch the joke &#034;public option&#034; for the wrong reasons, but it does need to ditched.  FAIR did a great expose on the media blackout of single-payer.  People who want the &#034;public option&#034; still probably think that this means a Medicare option, since the corporate media hasn&#039;t publicized the fact that now, it isn&#039;t.  Single=payer is still what people want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Latimer</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/06/the-center-of-the-health-reform-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-8543</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Latimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11794#comment-8543</guid>
		<description>Not for these reasons, but doesn&#039;t the &quot;public option&quot; need to be flushed?

That&#039;s what you do with turds, isn&#039;t it?

Maybe with that piece of shit no longer on the table (apologies for the image that evokes), MoveOn and other &quot;progressive&quot; Obamacare pimps will be forced to take a stand on single payer, and will show which side they&#039;re really on.

You don&#039;t give someone dying of thirst piss to drink.  Maybe it&#039;s better than nothing, but this isn&#039;t anywhere near the best we can hope for, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for these reasons, but doesn&#039;t the &#034;public option&#034; need to be flushed?</p>
<p>That&#039;s what you do with turds, isn&#039;t it?</p>
<p>Maybe with that piece of shit no longer on the table (apologies for the image that evokes), MoveOn and other &#034;progressive&#034; Obamacare pimps will be forced to take a stand on single payer, and will show which side they&#039;re really on.</p>
<p>You don&#039;t give someone dying of thirst piss to drink.  Maybe it&#039;s better than nothing, but this isn&#039;t anywhere near the best we can hope for, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

