Inside Dana Milbank's Bubble
06/12/2009 by Steve RendallIn his June 11 Washington Post column about a Capitol Hill hearing featuring single-payer advocates (imagine that!), Dana Milbank sheds no light on the policy debate, but manages to reveal just how deeply enveloped he is inside the Beltway bubble.
"Socialism is not dead," smirks Milbank. "It has, however, been confined to a House subcommittee." The columnist oozes condescension for single-payer activists at the hearing for harboring the quaint presumption they might get any real attention in Washington with their unpopular policy. Writes Milbank:
President Obama said it would be a "huge disruption." Democratic lawmakers ignored the single-payer crowd so completely that 13 activists got themselves arrested last month protesting at Senate Finance Committee hearings.
Since single-payer is such a non-starter, Milbank explains, the hearings are really no more than a safety valve, a token bone thrown to angry advocates in need of blowing off steam. In the end, he explains, little of substance was aired because "it was a day for venting, not answers."
In the world outside Milbank's bubble, of course, single payer is quite popular. For years, polls have consistently found majorities supporting tax-financed national health insurance. A January New York Times/CBS poll found 59 percent in favor of government-provided national health insurance. The same goes for surveys of medical professionals; for instance, a 2008 poll of U.S. doctors, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found 59 percent supported a single-payer plan.
Milbank might have used his valuable column space to probe the disconnect in American democracy, where the public and relevant professionals favor a policy that can barely get arrested in official Washington. While he may think he's made good fun of healthcare activists, what he's really done is reveal how profoundly alienated he is from basic notions of democracy and the open debate of ideas.
Tags: Dana Milbank, single-payer, Washington Post
Posted in Healthcare | Permalink | Trackback | Share
Diggit
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo
Facebook
StumbleUpon
June 12th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Sadly, Milbank is quite right about this: "Milbank explains, the hearings are really no more than a safety valve, a token bone thrown to angry advocates in need of blowing off steam."
June 23rd, 2009 at 4:56 am
No, this is no space to give a self-anointed "expert" like Milbank any credit. This idiocy ("it was a day for venting, not for answers") is typical of the cocktail-party chatter that passes for "comment" from the mobbed-up opiners. The statement is patronizing Orwellian propaganda, denigrating the passionate and involved advocates with a ridiculous assertion of superior knowledge. Cheers to FAIR for seeing these pernicious pronouncements as sinister.
August 7th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
[...] Kurtz recently offered fellow Washington Post reporters Dana Milbank and Chris Cillizza a chance to apologize for having, in an online Post feature, "implied Hillary [...]
March 18th, 2010 at 11:46 am
[...] Milbank led the cheers for White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel as chief dragger to the right (FAIR Blog, 3/2/10), whereas Broder saw his blame-the-boss disloyalty as unseemly (3/4/10); on the other hand, it was Broder who thrilled recently to the "pitch-perfect populism" of Sarah Palin (2/11/10), while Milbank's column today (3/16/10) finds a similar spiel by Dick Armey to be as worthy of ridicule as, say, single-payer advocates (FAIR Blog, 6/12/09). [...]