Comments on: WaPo Op-Eder Unnamed as AIG Flack http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/27/wapo-op-eder-unnamed-as-aig-flack/ The national media watch group Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:38:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Charlie Rose's Debt Commission Non-Debate http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/27/wapo-op-eder-unnamed-as-aig-flack/comment-page-1/#comment-55138 FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Charlie Rose's Debt Commission Non-Debate Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:03:40 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7653#comment-55138 [...] Rose show presented a discussion of the Simpson/Bowles plan on November 11. One guest, Harvard's Martin Feldstein, had this to say: There is a lot to like in it.  I think that it is very bold.  Every aspect of [...] [...] Rose show presented a discussion of the Simpson/Bowles plan on November 11. One guest, Harvard's Martin Feldstein, had this to say: There is a lot to like in it.  I think that it is very bold.  Every aspect of [...]

]]> By: FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Non-Disclosure: A Way of Life at the Washington Post http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/27/wapo-op-eder-unnamed-as-aig-flack/comment-page-1/#comment-4073 FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Non-Disclosure: A Way of Life at the Washington Post Fri, 22 May 2009 09:54:11 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7653#comment-4073 [...] Schwarz recently caught the Washington Post crediting the author of an anti-progressive tax op-ed as just "an economics [...] [...] Schwarz recently caught the Washington Post crediting the author of an anti-progressive tax op-ed as just "an economics [...]

]]> By: FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » WSJ Distorts Tax Rate for the Rich http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/27/wapo-op-eder-unnamed-as-aig-flack/comment-page-1/#comment-3644 FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » WSJ Distorts Tax Rate for the Rich Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:20:34 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7653#comment-3644 [...] taxes on "people making over $250,000," that means an increase only in the 250,001st dollar and onward. It's not, in other words, as if a guy earning $249,999 and a guy earning $250,001 will be paying [...] [...] taxes on "people making over $250,000," that means an increase only in the 250,001st dollar and onward. It's not, in other words, as if a guy earning $249,999 and a guy earning $250,001 will be paying [...]

]]>