Comments on: NYT Rules for Democrats: Don't Annoy Republicans http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/13/times-rules-for-democrats-dont-annoy-republicans/ The national media watch group Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: March 2009 « Questionable Content http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/13/times-rules-for-democrats-dont-annoy-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-42167 March 2009 « Questionable Content Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:10 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7065#comment-42167 [...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/13/times-rules-for-democrats-dont-annoy-republicans/ [...] [...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/13/times-rules-for-democrats-dont-annoy-republicans/ [...]

]]> By: Doug Latimer http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/13/times-rules-for-democrats-dont-annoy-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-3141 Doug Latimer Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:52:18 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7065#comment-3141 I think you're confusing what should be with what is. Obama *shouldn't* see this as a problem ... he *should* do the right thing. But Pear's right ... for the wrong reasons ... in saying he *does* see this as a problem. At least, going by the empirical evidence on all this goddamn "bipartisanship" he proselytizes about at every opportunity, that's the logical conclusion, isn't it? That the corpress cheerleads for same should tell you something about their goals ... and his. I think you're confusing what should be with what is.

Obama *shouldn't* see this as a problem … he *should* do the right thing.

But Pear's right … for the wrong reasons … in saying he *does* see this as a problem.

At least, going by the empirical evidence on all this goddamn "bipartisanship" he proselytizes about at every opportunity, that's the logical conclusion, isn't it?

That the corpress cheerleads for same should tell you something about their goals … and his.

]]>