In the wake of Charles Freeman's withdrawal from consideration for a top intelligence post, the Washington Post today published and editorial headlined "Blame the 'Lobby'":

For the record, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee says that it took no formal position on Mr. Freeman's appointment and undertook no lobbying against him. If there was a campaign, its leaders didn't bother to contact the Post editorial board.

This is true--no one was talking to the editorial board. They were talking to reporters--at least, that's what one learns elsewhere in the Post today:

For example, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), often described as the most influential pro-Israel lobbying group in Washington, "took no position on this matter and did not lobby the Hill on it," spokesman Josh Block said.

But Block responded to reporters' questions and provided critical material about Freeman, albeit always on background, meaning his comments could not be attributed to him, according to three journalists who spoke to him. Asked about this yesterday, Block replied: "As is the case with many, many issues every day, when there is general media interest in a subject, I often provide publicly available information to journalists on background."

Tags: AIPAC, Washington Post

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 12th, 2009 at 9:58 am and is filed under Media Criticism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.