I Couldn't Eat Another Bite, I'm…98 Percent Empty?
03/12/2009 by Jim NaureckasUnder the Onion-ready headline "Obama Calls for Earmark Reform, Signs Earmark-Laden Spending Bill," (3/12/09), the L.A. Times' James Oliphant and Christi Parsons begin their story:
President Obama railed against pork barrel projects on Wednesday. Then he signed a massive spending bill stuffed with them.
I'm not sure what the cut-off for something being "stuffed" with something else is, but I'm pretty sure that 2 percent doesn't qualify. Maybe the word they're looking for is "sprinkled"?
Tags: Barack Obama, Christi Parsons, James Oliphant, L.A. Times
Diggit
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo
Facebook
StumbleUpon

December 16th, 2010 at 11:14 am
[...] spending is directed to legislator-specified projects--generally without pointing out what a tiny fraction of total spending this is, or that without the earmarking this money would be spent anyway, on some [...]