Media writer Nat Ives (AdvertisingAge.com, 2/23/09) throws some cold water on overheated reportage of "all the apocalyptic news about newspapers":
Even as they take blow after blow from recession and digital media, newspapers themselves still earn decent profits….
"Not a lot of papers are operating at a loss," said John Morton, the veteran industry analyst. "There are roughly 1,400 daily newspapers. We only hear about the top markets. That leaves at least 1,300 papers out there."Publicly owned newspapers averaged an operating profit of 10.8 percent in the first three quarters of last year.
In fact, Ives tells us that, despite "rolling in layoffs," if you don't count "one-time charges such as severance and write-downs," the "country's biggest newspaper publisher, Gannett… produced an 18 percent operating profit margin last year"–proving that "there's no reason for newspapers themselves, whoever owns them, to stop the presses. Most operations are plenty profitable."
The problem with newspapers, as the late Molly Ivins noted, is not how much money they make–it's how much money Wall Street expects them to make.
[...] and other printed media. The fact we don't hear highlighted in conjunction with this, though, is that newspapers are still in fact running a profitable business. They are still making money, just not as much as they used to. In terms of figuring out ways of [...]
[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/26/newspapers-still-profitable-wall-street-still-greedy/ [...]
[...] put their talents to work doing what they love. There's no reason it can't happen; newspapers ARE profitable despite what we're told. They're just not profitable enough for the investors of the publicly-traded conglomerates [...]