<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support Wanes for Caricature of Fairness Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bogus Net Neutrality Poll</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-68031</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bogus Net Neutrality Poll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5954#comment-68031</guid>
		<description>[...] 2009 Rasmussen did a survey about the Fairness Doctrine, which was debunked here at the FAIR Blog (2/17/09). Rasmussen asked respondents if &quot;the government should require all radio stations to offer equal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009 Rasmussen did a survey about the Fairness Doctrine, which was debunked here at the FAIR Blog (2/17/09). Rasmussen asked respondents if &quot;the government should require all radio stations to offer equal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: February 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-42412</link>
		<dc:creator>February 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5954#comment-42412</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/ . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/</a> . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rasmussen Poll Advances New World Order Paranoia</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rasmussen Poll Advances New World Order Paranoia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5954#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>[...] Rasmussen poll has been criticized for putting a right-wing skew on its questions--a strategy that helps Scott Rasmussen garner frequent appearances on Fox News and the like, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rasmussen poll has been criticized for putting a right-wing skew on its questions--a strategy that helps Scott Rasmussen garner frequent appearances on Fox News and the like, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commprof</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/support-wanes-for-caricature-of-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>commprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5954#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>The conservative net casts wide as the misinformation campaign unfairly demonizes the Fairness Doctrine, ignoring the context in which it was framed.
Perhaps a successful tack for progressives interested in fairness should be an effort to bring back the &quot;self-regulation&quot; of the broadcast industry with The Radio Code; seeking a return to decency and civility in public commercial broadcast.
Just last week in Denver, longtime libertarian/conservative talker Peter Boyles repeatedly referred to Denver Democratic Congresswoman Diana DeGette as, &quot;Vagina DeGette.&quot;
In a half-hearted apology on the air (2-23) to the Denver Post reporter who called him out, KHOW&#039;s Boyles asked how he should address her, and suggested &quot;Vagina Green&quot; (Susan Greene).
This isn&#039;t about politics. But rather it is about a commercial radio industry unable to maintain any standards of decency in broadcast, exactly what the self-regulated &quot;Radio Code&quot; addressed from the 1960&#039;s to the mid-80&#039;s.
How things have changed when liberal/progressives call for decency in broadcast, and conservatives resort to crass, tackiness in order to hawk their broadcast of what has become a widespread soiling of the publics airwaves.

Leave a Reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conservative net casts wide as the misinformation campaign unfairly demonizes the Fairness Doctrine, ignoring the context in which it was framed.<br />
Perhaps a successful tack for progressives interested in fairness should be an effort to bring back the &#034;self-regulation&#034; of the broadcast industry with The Radio Code; seeking a return to decency and civility in public commercial broadcast.<br />
Just last week in Denver, longtime libertarian/conservative talker Peter Boyles repeatedly referred to Denver Democratic Congresswoman Diana DeGette as, &#034;Vagina DeGette.&#034;<br />
In a half-hearted apology on the air (2-23) to the Denver Post reporter who called him out, KHOW&#039;s Boyles asked how he should address her, and suggested &#034;Vagina Green&#034; (Susan Greene).<br />
This isn&#039;t about politics. But rather it is about a commercial radio industry unable to maintain any standards of decency in broadcast, exactly what the self-regulated &#034;Radio Code&#034; addressed from the 1960&#039;s to the mid-80&#039;s.<br />
How things have changed when liberal/progressives call for decency in broadcast, and conservatives resort to crass, tackiness in order to hawk their broadcast of what has become a widespread soiling of the publics airwaves.</p>
<p>Leave a Reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

