<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Media&#039;s Real Presidential Breakthrough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/10/new-medias-real-presidential-breakthrough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/10/new-medias-real-presidential-breakthrough/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hubertg</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/10/new-medias-real-presidential-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-2753</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubertg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5513#comment-2753</guid>
		<description>Obama DID answer the question.....he said &quot;moving forward was more important at this time&quot;...that means they go scot free.

I think these &#039;Bushes&#039; should have been impeached and brought up on war crimes in the Hague...I find Obama&#039;s answer unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama DID answer the question&#8230;..he said &#034;moving forward was more important at this time&#034;&#8230;that means they go scot free.</p>
<p>I think these &#039;Bushes&#039; should have been impeached and brought up on war crimes in the Hague&#8230;I find Obama&#039;s answer unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

