Comments on: CNN's Handwriting Analysis http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/21/cnns-handwriting-analysis/ The national media watch group Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:32:38 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: January 2009 « Questionable Content http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/21/cnns-handwriting-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-42703 January 2009 « Questionable Content Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:33:26 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=4783#comment-42703 [...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/21/cnns-handwriting-analysis/ . [...] [...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/21/cnns-handwriting-analysis/ . [...]

]]> By: wzekanoski http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/21/cnns-handwriting-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-2535 wzekanoski Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:28:38 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=4783#comment-2535 CNN, what a bunch of posers. They think good journalism is swirling graphics, multiple split screens and crawling text. Sheesh. CNN, what a bunch of posers. They think good journalism is swirling graphics, multiple split screens and crawling text. Sheesh.

]]> By: Doug Latimer http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/21/cnns-handwriting-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-2531 Doug Latimer Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:28:17 +0000 http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=4783#comment-2531 This would be hysterical, if it wasn't. Right up there with the whole Jackie O/Michelle O comparison schtick. (I really have no idea if any corpress dips are engaging in such ... but I'd be sorely tempted to bet on it, wouldn't you?) This would be hysterical, if it wasn't.

Right up there with the whole Jackie O/Michelle O comparison schtick.

(I really have no idea if any corpress dips are engaging in such … but I'd be sorely tempted to bet on it, wouldn't you?)

]]>