How Does the New York Times Think Massacres Should Be Covered?
01/08/2009 by Jim NaureckasPeter Hart asked the New York Times:
What should TV reporting of a civilian massacre look like, exactly?
Well, I guess the Times thinks they should be covered this way:
...which is to say, they should be covered almost exclusively from the point of view of the community that the perpetrators of the massacres come from, with virtually no perspective from the people who are being massacred. Of course, this may depend upon the identity of the massacre victims.
Tags: Israel, New York Times, Palestine
Diggit
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo
Facebook
StumbleUpon
