From his perch over at Salon, Glenn Greenwald (11/18/08, ad-viewing required) sees "nothing new" in the current media craze for "bipartisanship": "To the contrary, the last eight years have been defined, more than anything else, by overarching bipartisan cooperation and consensus."

Where is the evidence of the supposed partisan wrangling that we hear so much about? Just examine the question dispassionately. Look at every major Bush initiative, every controversial signature Bush policy over the last eight years, and one finds virtually nothing but massive bipartisan support for them--the Patriot Act (original enactment and its renewal); the invasion of Afghanistan; the attack on, and ongoing occupation of, Iraq; the Military Commissions Act (authorizing enhanced interrogation techniques, abolishing habeas corpus, and immunizing war criminals); expansions of warrantless eavesdropping and telecom immunity; declaring part of Iran's government to be "terrorists"; our one-sided policy toward Israel; the $700 billion bailout; The No Child Left Behind Act, "bankruptcy reform," and on and on.

Greenwald writes that "most of those were all enacted with virtually unanimous GOP support and substantial, sometimes overwhelming, Democratic support: the very definition of 'bipartisanship.' That's just a fact"--and as such, "by definition, it does not remotely constitute 'change.'"

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 at 5:31 pm and is filed under Election. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.