Vietnam Through Obama: 'Profoundly Dishonest Narrative'

11/14/2008 by Gabriel Voiles

Speaking out again now that the U.S. presidential election has been decided, Bill Ayers tells Juan Gonzalez and Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!, 11/14/08) exactly why his family "actually didn't pay a lot of attention to" the ongoing media controversy over him:

We recognized that there was this cartoon character kind of thrust up on the screen, and I was an unwitting and unwilling part of his presidential campaign. We tried not to watch it, because, pretty much, it was distracting and kind of crazy-producing.... There's so much that's dishonest in it that it's kind of impossible to kind of know where to enter it.

First of all, the idea that Bill O'Reilly says, you know, that I was in hiding. I wasn't in hiding.... What I wasn't doing was commenting on the presidential campaign to the media...because we couldn't figure out a way to interrupt what we took to be a profoundly dishonest narrative.... We had no way into it.

The idea that the Weather Underground carried out terrorism is nonsense. We never killed or hurt a person. We never intended to. We existed from 1970 to 1976, the last years, the last half-decade of the war in Vietnam. And by contrast, the war in Vietnam really was a terrorist undertaking. The war in Vietnam was terror on a mass scale, with thousands of people every month being murdered, mostly from the air. And we were doing everything we could to stop it.

And so the government-friendly media version of that war--going strong to this day--continues to influence national U.S. politics, and has Ayers proclaiming "again, it's hard to know where to start to interrupt that narrative."

One Response to “Vietnam Through Obama: 'Profoundly Dishonest Narrative'”

  1. Politically shrewd and naturally likable « The Mississippifarian Says:

    [...] Context [...]

Leave a Reply