<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Endorses Obama-- With the Usual Caveats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: October 2008 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/comment-page-1/#comment-43315</link>
		<dc:creator>October 2008 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=1047#comment-43315</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/ 10/16 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/</a> 10/16 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Latimer</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/17/washington-post-endorses-obama-with-the-usual-caveats/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Latimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=1047#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;d say that&#039;s pretty much an accurate description of a Democrat ... at least of most national Democratic officeholders.

Rhetoric counts for nothing, and next to nothing has been what the party has done to distinguish itself from the Republicans ... only enough to continue to be the slightly lesser of two evils.

&quot;Laugh about it
Shout about it
When you&#039;ve got to choose
Every way you look at it, you lose&quot;

Still holds, don&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#039;d say that&#039;s pretty much an accurate description of a Democrat &#8230; at least of most national Democratic officeholders.</p>
<p>Rhetoric counts for nothing, and next to nothing has been what the party has done to distinguish itself from the Republicans &#8230; only enough to continue to be the slightly lesser of two evils.</p>
<p>&#034;Laugh about it<br />
Shout about it<br />
When you&#039;ve got to choose<br />
Every way you look at it, you lose&#034;</p>
<p>Still holds, don&#039;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

