<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;False Equivalence&#039; in Campaign Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: October 2008 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-43319</link>
		<dc:creator>October 2008 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=845#comment-43319</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Latimer</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/14/false-equivalence-in-campaign-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Latimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=845#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Media Advisory:

The last sentence can be read as branding Ayers a terrorist.

Was that the intent?

And as for intent ... isn&#039;t the aim of a terrorist to sow terror?

Was that what Ayers was trying to do forty years ago?  Whether you agree with his tactics or not, would you equate them with suicide bombers murdering civilians?

Of course, other types of bombers, manufactured by Boeing et al, have committed innumerable acts of terror across the globe, haven&#039;t they?

So who&#039;s a terrorist?  I&#039;m just asking the question ... and would appreciate an answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Media Advisory:</p>
<p>The last sentence can be read as branding Ayers a terrorist.</p>
<p>Was that the intent?</p>
<p>And as for intent &#8230; isn&#039;t the aim of a terrorist to sow terror?</p>
<p>Was that what Ayers was trying to do forty years ago?  Whether you agree with his tactics or not, would you equate them with suicide bombers murdering civilians?</p>
<p>Of course, other types of bombers, manufactured by Boeing et al, have committed innumerable acts of terror across the globe, haven&#039;t they?</p>
<p>So who&#039;s a terrorist?  I&#039;m just asking the question &#8230; and would appreciate an answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

